SHARE
Fracking
U.S. Rep Kendra Horn (D-Okla.) explains her opposition to H.R. 5867, The Ban Fracking Act on Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2020. (Gaylord News)

U.S. Rep. Kendra Horn (D-OK5) took steps Thursday to distance herself even further from the left-wing elements of her party by announcing her opposition to a fracking ban.

Horn said she opposes legislation to halt hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas production that has been proposed by U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR).

“Business and industry and our communities have to be able to plan,” Horn said. “We don’t just shift everything overnight. They have to be able to plan what is next and build infrastructure around it.” 

Gaylord NewsThis story was reported by Gaylord News, a Washington reporting project of the Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Oklahoma.

Horn’s announcement comes two weeks after the Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma called for the first-term congresswoman to publicly oppose her “party’s radical plan to ban the use of hydraulic fracturing.”

“We hope that Rep. Horn will take this opportunity to carefully consider the negative impacts her party’s proposed policies would have on the environment, our national energy security and the economy of her district,” said David D. Le Norman, Chairman of the Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma. 

Horn, instead, said she favors working together with lawmakers from across the aisle to ensure correct steps are taken and sensible action occurs. The key to energy and climate issues, according to Horn: bipartisan legislation. 

“It’s one step at a time — and that doesn’t feel as exciting — but if we just stay stuck, we are letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, and we are actually falling behind,” Horn said.

As Oklahoma is one of the nation’s leading producers of oil and natural gas, the newly proposed bill from Horn’s Democratic colleagues comes with some concerns.

The bill, H.R. 5867, the Ban Fracking Act, is aimed at ending fracking by the oil and gas industry. 

Soto said in a statement the bill would put an immediate ban on all new federal permits on infrastructure related to fracking as well as an immediate ban on fracking within 2,500 feet of homes and schools by next year. 

In 2025, the ban would then become nationwide. 

According to the Office of Fossil Energy, hydraulic fracking involves the injection of water into the ground so as to extract shale gas and residual oil.

“Typically [hydraulic fracking] involves injecting pressurized fluids to stimulate or fracture shale formations and release the natural gas. Sand pumped in with the fluids (often water) helps to keep the fractures open,” the Office of Fossil Energy said.

But the practice has been criticized by environmental groups, and the disposal of wastewater has been tied to earthquakes and ground-water contamination.

“Fracking is destroying our land and our water,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted on Feb. 12. “It is wreaking havoc on our communities’ health. We must do our job to protect our future from the harms caused by the fracking industry. That is why I am proud to introduce the Fracking Ban Act with @RepDarrenSoto today.”

However, the Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy currently argues that fracking causes no harm to water quality.

“If water is used as the pressurized fluid, as much as 20 percent can return to the surface via the well (known as flowback),” the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy said. “This water can be treated and reused — in fact, reuse of flowback fluids for subsequent hydraulic fracture treatments can significantly reduce the volume of wastewater generated by hydraulic fracturing.”

The Global Energy Institute said hydraulic fracking companies have already created 1.7 million jobs throughout the states and are projected to create over three million more jobs by 2035. 

According to Horn, the impact of banning fracking could be devastating economically for Oklahoma specifically.  

“It would have dramatic impacts: tens of thousands of jobs in Oklahoma,” Horn said. “Our ability to make sure the United States can rely on our domestic sources of energy consumption and that we are not dependent on foreign sources of oil is a national security issue.” 

Further, a 2014 study from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that, by the year 2040, natural gas prices will have risen 70 percent if there were no increases in natural gas development using fracking.

“Right now, our infrastructure is based around [fracking], and making dramatic changes overnight not only isn’t sustainable, it impacts our ability to continue to address environmental issues,” Horn said.

Horn said she believes the best thing for Oklahomans is to pursue incremental steps, just as the energy industry has already started doing by switching from coal to natural gas and implementing clean energy sources such as wind and solar power. 

“We have to make sure that when we are making decisions, we do it recognizing we have to invest in the next generation of technology,” Horn said. “There are also environmental factors, and there are economic factors and jobs. We are talking about the impacts in our communities.”